Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Death of Harriett Barker (nee Healey)
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Julie | Report | 6 Dec 2016 10:56 |
Austin & Gwyn, many thanks for tracking down the details that have solved the mystery of what happened to Harriett. Just annoyed with myself that these didn't turn up on my own searches, but message to self that freeBMD searches may not throw up a match if the first name spelling differs slightly. |
|||
|
AustinQ | Report | 6 Dec 2016 06:13 |
Nice find Gwyn- confirms the 1960 Warwick death is the correct one. |
|||
|
Gwyn in Kent | Report | 6 Dec 2016 03:33 |
Ancestry has this probate record........... |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 6 Dec 2016 00:54 |
Julie |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
AustinQ | Report | 5 Dec 2016 21:20 |
Freebmd,org.uk : |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 5 Dec 2016 21:09 |
Austin - Having just repeated my earlier freeBMD search for Harriett across the whole country, the death regn at Warwick doesn't come up , even on a phonetic search. I had thought a phonetic search applied to both forename and surname, but apparently not, the entry only comes up if Harriet with a single t is entered in the first name field. This doesn't explain why I found nothing on FMP either, despite ticking variants on both forename & surname - oh well at least the Warwick entry came up on your search - as a matter of interest where did you find it? |
|||
|
AustinQ | Report | 5 Dec 2016 18:52 |
As a once qualified district nurse I'd think Edna would have been an ideal candidate to care for Harriet. - Perhaps Edna's son, Bruce, could confirm? |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 5 Dec 2016 17:34 |
Thanks Austin I had forgotten about the updating of the 1939 Reg for further marriages. You may have hit on a good candidate for the death, I had found Edna Frances on the 1939 Reg living with her older sister in Newark - occupation nurse. I suspect sight of the death cert may be needed to confirm whether it is the right one. |
|||
|
AustinQ | Report | 5 Dec 2016 16:30 |
Just looking at a tree on Ancestry- don't know how accurate it is but based on the areas they have for the deaths of her children, have you considered this death for Harriet: |
|||
|
AustinQ | Report | 5 Dec 2016 15:34 |
Have you checked in the areas where her children were living? |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 5 Dec 2016 15:12 |
Thanks Maddie, I don't think this is likely to be her, it seems to relate to a burial in Kirmington. The family have no apparent connection with that area, e.g none of her children migrated to this neck of the woods, but if no other alternatives pop up it may be worth looking at this one. |
|||
|
Maddie | Report | 5 Dec 2016 14:56 |
a possible ???? |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 5 Dec 2016 14:43 |
I am struggling to find a death for Harriett, who was born 18 Mar 1879. Her birth was reg'd in Nottingham under her mothers name Healey, but she came from Lincolnshire, and married Thomas Perkins back in Lincolnshire only a few weeks later. Harriet was brought up as Perkins. She married Frank Barker and moved to Claypole, Lincolnshire, where the family appears on both the 1911 census and the 1939 Reg. Frank died in 1946 and is buried at Claypole (entry in Parish Register traced) . I cannot find a death regn for Harriett under Barker or variants, and have also looked for a possible 2nd marriage and come up blank on both. Can anyone help? |