Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
TAKE CARE. ON FMPAST TRANSCRIPTIONS
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Michael | Report | 29 Aug 2012 14:38 |
In defence of findmypast.com they are giving exactly the same information that freebmd gives. There were 4 names on page 142, South Stoneham, 2nd quarter 1904. Freebmd also clearly shows that there was no indication which of the 2 men married which of the 2 women. |
|||
|
DazedConfused | Report | 28 Aug 2012 16:14 |
And we all know what ASSUMPTIONS do |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Thelma | Report | 28 Aug 2012 12:12 |
I must admit that it is presented badly.All to easy to assume that the first spouse is the correct one. |
|||
|
DazedConfused | Report | 28 Aug 2012 11:41 |
Sadly I and many of us (no doubt you too Dizzi in the past) have found that our cousins over the pond are not very good at checking details. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 28 Aug 2012 09:39 |
Always be careful with any transcribed info on any site |
|||
|
DIZZI | Report | 28 Aug 2012 09:21 |
BE CAREFULLY WITH FMPAST TRANSCRIPTIONS ON US SITE! |
|||
Researching: |