Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Name on birth certificate.
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Colin | Report | 21 Sep 2013 22:50 |
Whilst searching the BMD index for a relative born in the 1930's I found two entries next to each other, one containing the name of the person I was looking for and a second with a different first name born to the same mother on the same day, same place. The page number in the index was the same except the second had a letter 'a' suffix. The first name of this one was completely unknown to me. At that point I thought they were twins |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 21 Sep 2013 22:58 |
Perhaps the parents changed their minds after the birth was registered and had the other names added. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 21 Sep 2013 23:11 |
Hello Colin, this might help |
|||
|
Porkie_Pie | Report | 21 Sep 2013 23:30 |
Colin, Column 10 is for names given after the initial registration, The suffix is to show that there has been an amendment to an original entry, |
|||
|
mgnv | Report | 22 Sep 2013 05:19 |
The "correct" name is the one in col 10 - really b.certs don't necessarily have any connection with people's legal names. Their legal name is whatever they say it is, so long as this isn't done for fraudulent purposes - in the case of minors, it's whatever their parent says it is. |
|||
|
Colin | Report | 22 Sep 2013 10:17 |
Thank you all for the prompt replies and for providing an answer to my query. It now makes sense. |