Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
A conundrum. All theories would be welcome
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
BatMansDaughter | Report | 14 Apr 2014 14:57 |
If John Essex/Evans was born prior to a marriage or his birth father had died when he was young his mother may have married a Mr Essex, often a young child would 'adopt' his step fathers surname. |
|||
|
Paul Barton, Special Agent | Report | 13 Apr 2014 19:45 |
This is a juicy one isn't it? However, one thing is worth pointing out. Back in those days divorce was almost impossible for anybody but the wealthy. It was not uncommon for a mutual agreement between the two parties to separate and for one to move right out of the area. They would then declare themselves to be widowed in order to remarry. The chances of the ruse being detected were small because there was not the same flow of information across the country as there now is. There would be no animosity between the two parties and it would be in both their interests to support each other's stated position. So don't go thinking a bigamist was always cheating on their spouse... it could have been what they both wanted. |
|||
|
Gerry | Report | 13 Apr 2014 19:20 |
thank you Potty |
|||
|
Potty | Report | 12 Apr 2014 14:22 |
Ann Essex goes on to marry Samuel Holland: |
|||
|
Potty | Report | 12 Apr 2014 13:25 |
Gerry, if you have access to Ancestry, take a look at the image of this record: |
|||
|
Gerry | Report | 11 Apr 2014 23:09 |
yes i have had a bigamist before but John Evans/Essex seems to be using both surnames with the same faamily |
|||
|
Paul Barton, Special Agent | Report | 10 Apr 2014 22:23 |
I did come across a similar situation in my own family research and it turned out the chap was alternating between two identities because he was a bigamist! |
|||
|
Kucinta | Report | 10 Apr 2014 21:37 |
Just wondering whether John Evans/Essex was maybe born before the marriage of his parents, and fluctuates between their two surnames, but familysearch is having 'technical difficulties' so I can't look for an Essex-Evans marriage |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Kucinta | Report | 10 Apr 2014 21:31 |
They are using Evans by 1861: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Kucinta | Report | 10 Apr 2014 21:29 |
Just for info: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Kucinta | Report | 10 Apr 2014 21:22 |
Surrey, England, Baptisms, 1813-1912 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Gerry | Report | 10 Apr 2014 21:08 |
On 17/12/1860 John ESSEX (1835) married Ann Parfitt (1833) in Aldershot. |