Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Twins listed wrongly

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Karen

Karen Report 7 Mar 2015 19:10

Hi,
Ive just recently looked at the BMD for my mother and her twin brother and have seen that they have been listed wrongly....bith are on the right page but on one the surname has been spelt with an I and the other an E...... this was in the 1940's !!

Kay????

Kay???? Report 7 Mar 2015 20:30


If you mean an I was used within the surname instead of an E then it was an easy mistake to make when they were transcribed from the large ledgers onto fiche by hand ,which is the format you see and read from.

SylviaInCanada

SylviaInCanada Report 8 Mar 2015 01:08

May I suggest that you add a Post It note to the entry on freebmd.org.uk ................


that way, others will know the correct spelling.


The GRO entry itself cannot be changed

Karen

Karen Report 8 Mar 2015 17:06

Thank you both for replying

InspectorGreenPen

InspectorGreenPen Report 8 Mar 2015 17:08

I would just add that there are circumstances where the entry in the GRO master index will be changed if subsequent investigation by them confirms it differs from the actual register.

The reason I say that is because the very thing happened with my own marriage entry where both our surnames were indexed incorrectly by the GRO and were subsequently corrected after I had written to them pointing this out.

However, the correction will never find its way onto fiches, scans and copies in circulation unless the original index is ever re-scanned at a future date.