Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Sorry to be a pain
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 10 Nov 2015 19:05 |
For reference: |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 10 Nov 2015 17:34 |
|
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Linda | Report | 10 Nov 2015 17:30 |
Yes that is him my grand mother was his second wife. But I knew her half siblings but didn't know he was William I've only ever called him ted so that explains why I couldn't find his war records I was looking for a T or An R thank you so much |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 10 Nov 2015 17:20 |
Children |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 10 Nov 2015 17:15 |
So did he then remarry |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 10 Nov 2015 17:12 |
????? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 10 Nov 2015 17:09 |
Is this him? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 10 Nov 2015 17:07 |
Only married as Edward |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Linda | Report | 10 Nov 2015 17:01 |
I am continuing my research into Edward Ebenezer Cracknell looking at marriage records I can find an entry for him in 1916 I know he married someone called Phillips but cannot find an entry for her I was just trying to find her name. Where am I going wrong. Thank you in anticipation |