Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Copying documents
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
SuffolkVera | Report | 21 Dec 2015 16:00 |
I went with my brother to Devon record office last year and they allowed us to photograph documents with no charge as long as we didn't use flash. As Argyllgran said, its's probably best to contact any record offices you want to visit and ask them what their policy is. |
|||
|
Inky1 | Report | 21 Dec 2015 08:59 |
On my last visit to the London Metropolitan Archives I paid a nominal fee, which entitled me to take photos. The only condition was that I could not use flash. |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 20 Dec 2015 16:57 |
Best to ask the library or office concerned what they permit . |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 20 Dec 2015 16:16 |
Hi, looking for some thoughts about copying documents for family history purposes on visits to libraries, records offices & the like. Whilst some things can be printed because they are fiche or micro-film, and others photo-copied, many items don't fall into either category. What do folk find the most sucessful and convenient? I am wondering whether to go for a hand held scanner or whether photographing works ok where hand written documents are concerned? With hand held scanners, has anyone experienced problems being allowed to use them? |