Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Child Benefit Records 1940s
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
JoyLouise | Report | 1 Oct 2016 17:20 |
Some maintenance orders (sometimes listed as paternity orders) were listed in local newspapers, more especially in the earlier years of the twentieth century. |
|||
|
+++DetEcTive+++ | Report | 1 Oct 2016 17:12 |
JoyLouise - we've established that Shaun was referring to something different. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JoyLouise | Report | 1 Oct 2016 17:08 |
I seem to remember that this was originally called Family Allowance and was only paid out in respect of the second and subsequent children. |
|||
|
AustinQ | Report | 30 Sep 2016 16:33 |
Depending on the year, it may also be mentioned in newspapers. I had success finding the father of my Nanna's first born illegitimate child through the newspapers. The alleged father denied paternity but was still ordered to pay maintenance. |
|||
|
+++DetEcTive+++ | Report | 30 Sep 2016 10:37 |
Ah! That's something completely different. We all assumed you meant the Universal Credit paid by the Government & funded by tax payers. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 30 Sep 2016 10:33 |
You could look at the local archives for the area and check the Magistrates Court Records for the maintenance hearing. |
|||
|
Shaun | Report | 30 Sep 2016 08:53 |
Many thanks for the information. |
|||
|
+++DetEcTive+++ | Report | 29 Sep 2016 23:30 |
Bearing in mind that the child would be named, even if the records survived its highly unlikely that the records would be available to view. They'd be covered by the 100 year rule as the oldest 'child' would only be c71 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
malyon | Report | 29 Sep 2016 17:04 |
http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/cabinetpapers/themes/beveridge-report-child-benefit.htm |
|||
|
malyon | Report | 29 Sep 2016 17:03 |
don't think there was child benefits in the 1940's started in 1977 |
|||
|
Shaun | Report | 29 Sep 2016 16:05 |
Hi All |