Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Generation Question

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Mark

Mark Report 13 Apr 2019 16:07

If (A) has 12 generations connection to our Common Ancestor

and (B) has 11 generations connection to our Common Ancestor

What relation is A to B


Many thanks

+++DetEcTive+++

+++DetEcTive+++ Report 13 Apr 2019 17:01

Something along the lines on

A is 12th cousin once removed to B
B is 11th cousin once removed to A

Although there are relationship charts around, they may not go back that far!

Mark

Mark Report 13 Apr 2019 17:20

Believe me I have looked I could only find one going back as far as 10 generations.

Thank you

Andysmum

Andysmum Report 14 Apr 2019 14:18

They are 10th cousins once removed.

Starting with the common ancestor:
1st generation (children) are siblings
2nd generation (grandchildren) are 1st cousins
3rd generation (great grandchildren) are 2nd cousins
and so on as far as descendant B, who is
11th generation, therefore 10th cousin to descendant A's parent.

For every generation difference between the two people there is one "removal". If descendant A was 13th generation, they would be 10th cousins twice removed.

I hope this makes sense.

ErikaH

ErikaH Report 14 Apr 2019 15:06

Not close then............... ;-)

+++DetEcTive+++

+++DetEcTive+++ Report 14 Apr 2019 16:08

:-D

Out of interest, Mark, what dates have you for the common ancestor? Assuming 25 years per generation ( yes, it’s a random number) they could have been around in the 1600s

Mark

Mark Report 17 Apr 2019 15:11

we connect to a man who was born 1550

Kense

Kense Report 17 Apr 2019 20:09

From the information given they could be any thing from child and parent, to what Det says