Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Robert Lindsay on Who Do You Think You Are.
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Maddie | Report | 8 Jun 2020 14:26 |
HERBERT D |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 8 Jun 2020 08:31 |
Welcome to the boards, Tina. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Tina | Report | 7 Jun 2020 22:27 |
Hi |
|||
|
FamilyFogey | Report | 14 Sep 2006 17:03 |
To Julia Bell Well the entry for the birth was shown on the episode and said Herbert Dawson Hallsworth - Herbert Dawson were his two christian names. That and Hannah's maiden name was Hallsworth.... Alex |
|||
|
Julia | Report | 14 Sep 2006 16:47 |
Really enjoyed reading all the posts. How did you find out surname of Herbert was Hallsworth? Or am I missing something v obvious? Why didn't they suggest that Dawson, given as a middle name, might have been the father's surname? |
|||
|
Yvette | Report | 14 Sep 2006 14:30 |
hi all, yes i enjoyed last nights programme as well, but was really frustrated at the ease Robert Lindsey found the military records, i have been trying for nearly 2 years now and have not had a single breakthrough, whoever helped him i wish would help me!! |
|||
|
♥Athena | Report | 14 Sep 2006 12:29 |
Yes, I enjoyed last night's programme and sat there wishing that I had all the experts to-hand and being able to jet off to various places to tread the paths of my ancestors, as these celebrities do! The bit where he was searching for the burial of the 3 yr old Patricia Ann and found her on the anniversary of her burial really shocked him, didn't it? I know exactly how he felt. Recently (on August 16th), a Genes member (Patricia Horner) kindly did some searching for me at her local Wiltshire records office to locate the marriage of my 5xG Grandparents...and we were both spooked when she found them...on the 220th anniversary of their marriage (16 August 1786)! I will never forget that day. Funny how things like that happen, isn't it? |
|||
|
Montmorency | Report | 14 Sep 2006 12:27 |
Susan -- the blue cert that you have was issued for a special low fee, and was only supposed to be used to show that a child was old enough to start work. People applied for them when their child was ready to start work, if they didn't have any other proof of age. There's no connection with illegitimacy. The application form was filled in and signed by the parent on the front of the sheet, and then the register entry was copied out by the registrar on the back. This means the application side is an actual sample of your grandparent's handwriting and signature, not a registrar's transcription. The certs were intended to be treated as disposable, and most people probably threw them away once they'd been seen by the employer. |
|||
|
Uncle John | Report | 14 Sep 2006 11:46 |
I think this was a good example of building up a full picture of each generation before starting on the next. It so happened that the stories of both grandfathers and their immediate families was sufficient to make an interesting programme. |
|||
|
Devon Dweller | Report | 14 Sep 2006 11:11 |
My Grandfather was born in 1895 and Im lucky enough to have a letter from him to my Mum dated 1949. He tell's her how his Mother had lost most of her hair when she had him and it never did grow back because they had such an awful time. The reason he wrote her the letter was because she'd just had a baby and I know she had a pretty bad time of it. Up until recently, the 70's, all single mothers were treated like outcasts. My Grandfather was also given a surname for a middle name. |
|||
|
Lilly the flower | Report | 14 Sep 2006 09:04 |
I think you may well be right Kate/Shelia, I don't think there was much 'adoption' about in the early 1900's was there? I also have in my family, mothers that have used the 'fathers name' as a middle name for the son, I have a William John Smith C******born 1909, in the 1901 census mum aged 9 is a visitor in the Smith's household, who just happen to have a son called John Smith, !!!! and 8 years later there is mum 'holding the baby' who just happens to be callled William John Smith C******, to much of a coincidence I think....of course she was unmarried........Lilly |
|||
|
Kate | Report | 14 Sep 2006 08:37 |
Herbert Dawson Hallsworth died 1988 in Lincolnshire, in case there is anybody who doesn't know that by now! Kate. |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 14 Sep 2006 08:09 |
As to Robert Lindsay's uncle, I assumed that they were unable to know if Herbert went through life as Herbert Dawson, or under his mother's maiden name, or if he was adopted informally and had his name changed. I guess it would be a bit needle=haystack. Wouldn't mind betting that Robert - who seemed very interested - would want to try to find out later. |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 14 Sep 2006 08:07 |
I don't think there is a hard and fast rule on illegitimacy. Yes there are lots of stories about babies being found on doorsteps etc - but there are today, when unmarried parents are often the norm, rather than the exception. Servant girls who got pregnant would often be sacked by their employers and so on. But the illegitimate children I have in my family were born in the country and raised by other family members - grandparents, aunts, uncles etc and seem to have been accepted as family. Some people believe blood is thicker than water and stick by family members no matter what. Others disown family who do things they disapprove of. No doubt our ancestors were the same. I get the impression that being illegitimate became more of a stigma when people moved out of villages - where you couldn't keep secrets! - and into towns, where they became people trying to keep up appearances & respectability, hiding behind the net curtains. nell |
|||
|
****Nicky | Report | 14 Sep 2006 07:29 |
Hi Julia. My gran, still living, was born in 1918 and was illegitimate. Her mum was 17 at the time and as it happened during WW1 I have often wondered if the father went away to war and never came back. My great gran NEVER told my gran who her father was and it does leave an awful blank on my tree. I do know though that my gran had the most happiest childhood being raised by her grandparents who 100% stood by my great gran and woe betide anyone who said anything detrimental. Nicky |
|||
|
Janet in Yorkshire | Report | 14 Sep 2006 01:03 |
Kept, If you looked carefully, Herbert and Dawson were both forenames. I enjoyed it and was really pleased that at least programme focused entirely on one generation. As for no census, well this is exactly the situation most people are in at the start of their quest. It would be so boring if exactly the same sources and research methods were used every programme. Jay |
|||
|
Keptin | Report | 13 Sep 2006 23:52 |
Hi, I was surprised that the child was given the fathers name a his surname. The illegitimate certs that I have don't name the father and the child has the mothers surname. My certs are pre 1900's but I wouldn't have thought that would make any difference regarding the childs surname. I think Herbert could have been handed over to the fathers family. Kept. |
|||
|
Janice | Report | 13 Sep 2006 23:09 |
Hi Julia, There's another thread about this on the general board. Herbert Dawson Hallsworth died in 1988 in Lincolnshire, so he either kept that name - in which case people tonight will have recognised it- or he used another name and the death was registered under both names. Wonder if Herbert has children? I would have liked to have gone back at least one more generation. There was no census info on tonight's programme which I thought was a shame. Janice |
|||
|
Julia | Report | 13 Sep 2006 22:55 |
Anyone see it? I would have liked to see the illegitimacy issue raised discussed more than the military history aspect personally. Was it a total disgrace to have a child out of wedlock in 1914? I know about the situation as per the 2nd World War but not sure whether more of a blind eye was turned in earlier times? I am reasonably new to all this but did wonder about the middle name of the child, Bert, wasn't it Dawson? Isn't this a big clue as to what the father may have been called? Couldn't they have tried to investigate this avenue. Perhaps they did and Dawson was a dead end/too common a surname?? Interestingly many of the illegitmate births in my tree tend to be about the 1840 mark and most women went on to marry a few years afterwards. Wouldn't men have avoided them and viewed them as fallen women etc (Tess of the D'ubervilles...etc)?? |