Suggestions
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Suggestions: TREE
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
JustJohn | Report | 12 Sep 2012 08:24 |
Sylvia Your post? Had not realised you had been RR'd. Certainly not when I noticed mine had been RR'd. Yes, a real person looks at it. And sends a computer generated letter to the RR'd from no one warning me that further indiscretions will result in nails being removed. Perhaps it gets more personal if they decide a red card is in order. :-D :-D |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 12 Sep 2012 01:26 |
John |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JustJohn | Report | 11 Sep 2012 22:46 |
Yellow card, Ian. Have had two in just over a month. First was dismissed, because the opponent dived. This one has been upheld (abusive language to the ref). So it could be the old Steven Gerrard for me soon :-D :-D :-D |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Ian | Report | 11 Sep 2012 22:00 |
I give up what does RR mean |
|||
|
JustJohn | Report | 11 Sep 2012 20:57 |
Sylvia :-D :-D |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 11 Sep 2012 20:40 |
John |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Roger | Report | 11 Sep 2012 11:29 |
Thanks for your email |
|||
|
JustJohn | Report | 11 Sep 2012 11:12 |
At last I have been RR'd. Only the second time and thrilled. Think I was defending Sylvia and Porkie Pie and saying how nice they could be bothered to communicate with their fellow paying members, so that must be unacceptable to somebody :-D :-D |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Simon | Report | 11 Sep 2012 11:10 |
Ian, I sent her a personal email asking her to post something as the members were revolting. ;-) |
|||
|
Simon | Report | 11 Sep 2012 10:49 |
Yeah! Thanks Estelle! I know you do exist, really! Let's hope you and the Tree Team really do produce a list of 'proposed actions' and post it on here for people to see before you start fiddling again... |
|||
|
Ian | Report | 11 Sep 2012 10:47 |
Simon, looks like you spoke to soon. |
|||
|
Estelle | Report | 11 Sep 2012 10:40 |
Hi everyone, thanks to you all for your posts so far. I have been on holiday for a couple of weeks so not been around to post. I am sorry if you thought we were ignoring you - that is not the case at all. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Simon | Report | 11 Sep 2012 10:35 |
Oooh! look when I wrote this message! Still no sign of anybody from GR reaing this board they asked us to contribute to.... |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 11 Sep 2012 04:14 |
Stephen_SG |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Kense | Report | 10 Sep 2012 20:39 |
There needs to be some optimisation of the time it takes to download the full tree for those people who have large trees (in excess of 10000 names). |
|||
|
Kense | Report | 10 Sep 2012 14:10 |
When a major update is made to the tree, could a page appear when the tree is selected for the first time. This should give an outline of the changes that have been made to the tree and, more important, indicating where fuller details are given (FAQs) and, if there is still a problem, how to contact support. |
|||
|
Gillian | Report | 9 Sep 2012 16:17 |
I am very sorry but i dislike your new tree concept the old one was much better,easier to use and see.Clicking on the button to show it full page doesn't seem work,the arrows and the little tree obliterate half of the very small window and i wonder why they are needed at all,the way you had it before was much better.Why was it necessary to change and ruin a site which used to be a pleasure to use,that is something you don't always find.Perhaps it would be a good idea to give your users the option of keeping the original features,that way you could see which concept was thought to be the best,i would be more than delighted if this was available,i would change back as quickly as it was possible to do. |
|||
|
Thelma | Report | 8 Sep 2012 12:42 |
I think that there are several problems. |
|||
|
Kense | Report | 8 Sep 2012 09:18 |
Coreen, can you say roughly how many people you have in your tree. Is it under 5,000 over 20,000 or somewhere in between? |
|||
|
Cynthia | Report | 8 Sep 2012 08:55 |
When you start to type the name of a place in and other suggestions come up is quite normal practice on other sites - nothing new about it. As you press each key, the sequence changes until it hits possibilities. It is then up to you to decide which is the correct place for your search. |
|||
Researching: |