Suggestions
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Suggestions: TREE
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Colkitto | Report | 26 Aug 2012 16:43 |
Why so few boxes for details when first adding a new person? To enter place of birth I have to go to the horrid slidey out panel ( I blame Apple Corp for this style over function nonsense). Then I have to save this & then if I want to enter a baptism I can do this but I have save at least 3 times before it works. Does anyone else have to save each time they enter any small detail? |
|||
|
S80DP | Report | 26 Aug 2012 12:22 |
Either bring back the old tree or the old tree option. You might keep some paying customers. |
|||
|
Ian | Report | 26 Aug 2012 00:49 |
I reported all my concerns weeks ago direct to GR, I have just come back off holiday to find nothing has changed, except I cant open my using Mozilla Firefox. |
|||
|
Suzanne | Report | 25 Aug 2012 22:08 |
i wont be renewing my membership.......after almost 7 years. I cant get my head around this new tree, it looks amatuerish and is difficult to navigate and add/amend/delete data......an option to continue to use the old tree would be good. |
|||
|
Kense | Report | 25 Aug 2012 20:05 |
I would like to see the displayed box for Source enlarged. I know you can put more in it but it might as well be the same width as the Notes box. |
|||
|
Joanna | Report | 25 Aug 2012 18:59 |
Please please please go back to the old tree.I do not want to go elsewhere. |
|||
|
Porkie_Pie | Report | 25 Aug 2012 17:22 |
Colin, pages should not take more than 2/3 seconds to load, |
|||
|
KIMM | Report | 25 Aug 2012 17:13 |
Something needs to be done, fixed or whatever. |
|||
|
Colin | Report | 25 Aug 2012 16:33 |
Biggest and perhaps the hardest task is to restore customer faith in your ability to safely hold data on their behalf. |
|||
|
RolloTheRed | Report | 25 Aug 2012 16:20 |
Suggest that people stop banging on about the old tree view which is not going to come back and focus on the tree view that is currently in place and what can be done to improve it. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 25 Aug 2012 09:58 |
A return to the old tree. |
|||
|
Roger | Report | 24 Aug 2012 23:06 |
Well on the old tree we could scroll down a com[plete list of all other trees we had permission to see - not any more, there are on 5 pages for me, but I cannot see the bottom of the list without zooming to 75%, well I have poor eyesight and like to see everything 100% like I could on old tree. |
|||
|
Malcolm | Report | 24 Aug 2012 18:55 |
I agree with Andysmum & Catherine-With the old tree I could look at the record of say my great-grandmother (1858-1939) and see all her life details and a photo of her in her fifties-a complete picture of a real human being all on the same screen. The new tree presents me with a strange avatar of female with some wierd 1970s hairstyle that is supposed to represent her and I can only see her properly if I then open up the side box and click on her photo. Is there no way to get rid of them, how can they represent a real person? I would much rather there were no avatars at all when I open the tree. |
|||
|
CupCakes | Report | 24 Aug 2012 18:10 |
Would like to be able to click on any photo or image/document I have downloaded so there is a enlarged readable image. To also be available for those whose trees are shared with me & visa versa. |
|||
|
Cynthia | Report | 24 Aug 2012 17:47 |
Whilst I am generally happy with the new tree, I would like to be able to delete the many trees I have access to - mostly from people whom I have helped. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Catherine | Report | 24 Aug 2012 15:54 |
I would like for when I select a person on my tree that I can see his (her) info in ONE go - i.e. not having to slide open a panel on the right side of the screen and then scroll UP and/or DOWN. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Catherine | Report | 24 Aug 2012 15:45 |
I would like the box for each person on the tree to indicate GENDER by COLOUR (e.g. a BLUE box for Boys and a PINK box for Girls) so losing those cute little heads - there would be more room in the box then to indicate if a photo is available and even have the whole name on one line. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Porkie_Pie | Report | 24 Aug 2012 15:18 |
Could GR make it a priority for the tree to work in all modern browsers without having to switch between normal and compatibility view |
|||
|
Andysmum | Report | 24 Aug 2012 14:29 |
I agree with a lot of the above, but my particular dislike is the sliding panel. Please bring back the old lay-out where all information about a person was on one page. |
|||
|
Porkie_Pie | Report | 24 Aug 2012 14:00 |
I would like to be able to view my photo's in a larger panel? The thumbnail photo's are far too small |