Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
Kim
|
Report
|
15 Mar 2014 10:04 |
Hi all
I have been doing some research for a friend. I have located their ancestor's family in the 1851 census, at the village of Romsley in Worcestershire:
1851: Household #43, Romsley (surname transcribed as “Frow” on GR) Mary Trow, 29, head, nailor, born Romsley (listed condition as “married”) Thomas Trow, 11, son, nailor, born Romsley Jason Trow, 8, son, born Romsley Henery Trow, 2, son, born Romsley Siella Trow, 10 months, daughter, born Romsley Josiah Hunt, 28, lodger, bricklayer, born Romsley (first name transcribed as “Joseph” on GR)
I have not posted corrections on these spellings.
I wanted to find the same family in 1841. Mary Harris did not marry John Trow until 1843 (I have the certificate) but their son Thomas was born in 1839 (I have the certificate) so I was looking for Mary Harris, and a son Thomas (either Harris or Trow). I could not find them. Because "Trow" is often misspelled and even more often mistranscribed, I have searched simply for children called Thomas in the Bromsgrove district aged 1 or 2 (he was born on 30th November 1839) again with no result (there are some but none are him).
So I decided to try a house by house search. I collected a list of a dozen people who were on the 1851 census as both born and living in Romsley, and were over 10 years old, and looked for them in the 1841 census to try to locate pages covering Romsley. I found two of them living in Bromsgrove, but the rest simply did not appear (I was using the plus or minus 10 years for the ages in the search).
My question is, how do I find this village on the 1841 census. Is there a known method, or an "index" available somewhere which can tell me where to look, and if so how would I use that index to search the GR site's transcription of that census?
Thanks in advance for any assistance.
Regards
Kim Sargerson
|
|
patchem
|
Report
|
15 Mar 2014 10:20 |
I am sure someone will explain in detail how to access 1841 through genes for Romsley. I use ancestry and do not know how genes is configured.
Meanwhile, were you aware of this? http://www.worcesterbmsgh.co.uk/parish/romsley
|
|
Flip
|
Report
|
15 Mar 2014 10:42 |
The local family history society have transcribed the 1841 census
http://www.rhhs.org.uk/censuses/48-romsley-1841.html
|
|
MargaretM
|
Report
|
15 Mar 2014 10:49 |
Could this possibly be Mary in 1841 remembering that ages on that census were rounded down so she could have been 15-19? Do you have her father's name on marriage certificate?
1841 England Census about Mary Harris Name: Mary Harris Age: 15 Estimated birth year: abt 1826 Gender: Female Where born: Worcestershire, England Civil Parish: Bromsgrove Hundred: Doddingtree (Upper Division) County/Island: Worcestershire Country: England Registration district: Bromsgrove Sub-registration district: Bromsgrove Neighbors: View others on page Piece: 1195 Book: 5 Folio: 31 Page Number: 14 Household Members: Name Age Thomas Harris 70 Charlotte Harris 30 Mary Harris 15 Thos Harris 8 Mary Harris 2
|
|
Flip
|
Report
|
15 Mar 2014 11:04 |
If you follow the link, there are also christening records - there's one for Mary Harriss on 21/4/1822 daughter of Joseph & Mary of Dayhouse Bank (where she was living 1851). Also christened same day was sister Hannah.
|
|
Kim
|
Report
|
15 Mar 2014 12:04 |
Hello Flip, Margee
Thank you for your replies.
Margee: I appreciate the effort, but no, this is not the one. Her father's name on the marriage certificate is Joseph.
Flip: I thank you very much for the link, and it seems possible that Mary Harris is on this list. At Shut Mill Lane there is Joseph Harris, 60, ag. labourer, born in county Maria Harris, 25, not born in county (?)
This seems to be the most likely match despite the age being a little high and the "not born in county" being contradicted later, and the baptism 1822 fits exactly. She is probably a year or two old in 1822, but not as old as 5, despite claiming to be 29 in 1851 (and consistently 1861, 1871), as her son Thomas was born in 1839.
However, there is no sign of Thomas, whether surnamed Trow or Harris, at this point. The certificates I have are as follows:
(a) 1839 birth (registered 7th December 1839, in the FreeBMD index under TROW) Date and place: 30th November 1839, Romsley Name: Thomas Sex: boy Name of father: John Trow Name of mother: Mary Harris, singlewoman Occupation of father: nailor Signature/residence of informant: The mark X of Mary Harris, mother, Dayhouse Bank
(b) Marriage 1843 Marriage solemnised at the parish church in the parish of Halesowen in the county of Salop, August 5th 1843 John Trow, full age, bachelor, nailer, of Romsley quarter; father Daniel Trow, labourer Mary Harris, full age, spinster, nailer, of Romsley, father Joseph Harris, labourer. Both parties made their mark, and the marriage was "according to the rites.. of the established church by banns". witnesses George Fiddian (?), and the mark of Ann Hancox
(c) 1843 birth (registered 22nd December 1843) Date and place: 16th November 1843, Bromsgrove Name: Jesson [this is how "Jason" was spelled here] Sex: boy Name of father: John Trow Name of mother: Mary Trow, formerly Harris Occupation of father: labourer Signature/residence of informant: The mark X of John Trow, father, Chapmans Hill
The reason for my search is that John Trow is conspicuous by his absence. He is only present for the marriage and the birth of Jason Trow in 1843. His wife Mary returned to Romsley for the 1851 census, and has two further children listed, but their paternity is questionable. Her permanent lodger Josiah Hunt is probably the biological father. This is also true of 1861 and 1871. She describes her condition as "married" in all three censuses, and finally marries Josiah Hunt in 1876, so I assume John Trow is alive until 1871/1876 but living elsewhere. He does not appear on any of these censuses unless he was bigamous.
I can find no trace of a "Daniel Trow" (the stated father of John on the marriage certificate) anywhere. Unless John Trow was already married in 1841 to someone else, and gave false information in 1843, I seem to be stuck. Hence my search for the eldest son of this couple, Thomas, in 1841. If he is not with his mother or her family, the next most likely would be with his father. If people want to check all this out and give suggestions I would be most pleased.
However, the main thrust of my question was more general - what do people do to start a house-by-house search of a particular location in a particular census, if they do not already have a direct link to that location? I would welcome hints etc. on this topic, as it has been an option several times for me in past researches when a name was not coming up on an index search.
Regards
Kim
|
|
MargaretM
|
Report
|
15 Mar 2014 12:06 |
The 1841 census for Romsley & Hunnington is here but I can't see a Trow:
http://www.rhhs.org.uk/censuses/48-romsley-1841.html
|
|
Flip
|
Report
|
15 Mar 2014 13:03 |
It's possible to narrow down to districts on Ancestry and the first page of the record set gives details of the coverage, or you can search by address on FMP - but I've no idea how to do this on GR. Maybe contact GR support and ask?
|
|
Gee
|
Report
|
15 Mar 2014 13:09 |
Could this be the father of Thomas?
1841 England Census
Name:John Jove
Age:25
Estimated birth year:abt 1816
Gender:Male
Where born:Worcestershire, England
Civil Parish:Bromsgrove
Hundred:Doddingtree (Upper Division)
County/Island:Worcestershire
Registration district:Bromsgrove
Sub-registration district:Bromsgrove
Piece:1195
Book:4 Folio:36 Page Number:24
Household Members:
John Jove 25 <<<Nailor Maria Jove 20 Sarah Jove 9 Mo
|
|
Kim
|
Report
|
15 Mar 2014 13:17 |
Hi Gins
Thanks for looking. I think "Jove" is "Tove" and this surname should be pronounced "Tovey". Marriages 1840 June quarter, Bromsgrove 18/316 includes the names John Tovey, Maria Waterhouse, and I think this is them.
Regards
Kim
|
|
safc
|
Report
|
15 Mar 2014 14:45 |
Maria Whitehouse, "England Marriages, 1538–1973 " Name: John Torey Birth Date: Birthplace: Age: Spouse's Name: Maria Whitehouse Spouse's Birth Date: Spouse's Birthplace: Spouse's Age: Event Date: 19 Apr 1840 Event Place: Bromsgrove, Worcester, England Father's Name: Samuel Torey Mother's Name: Spouse's Father's Name: Thomas Whitehouse Spouse's Mother's Name: Race: Marital Status: Previous Wife's Name: Spouse's Race: Spouse's Marital Status: Spouse's Previous Husband's Name: Indexing Project (Batch) Number: I03752-6 System Origin: England-EASy GS Film number: 321129 Reference ID: 59
|
|
Gee
|
Report
|
15 Mar 2014 18:12 |
I looked through the whole of ' Dayhouse Bank' & Romsley in the 1841 census
Nothing, zilch and nada :-(
|
|
Chris Ho :)
|
Report
|
15 Mar 2014 18:23 |
Burial County Worcestershire Place Halesowen Church St John the Baptist RegisterNumber BurialDate 11 Dec 1848 Forename Joseph Relationship Rel1MaleForename Rel1FemaleForename Rel1Surname Surname HARRIS Age 64 Abode Romsley
Burial County Worcestershire Place Halesowen Church St John the Baptist RegisterNumber BurialDate 11 Dec 1860 Forename Thomas Relationship Rel1MaleForename Rel1FemaleForename Rel1Surname Surname TROW Age 21 Abode Cradley
(if fitting anywhere)
Chris :)
http://www.freereg.org.uk/cgi/Search.pl
|
|
Inky1
|
Report
|
15 Mar 2014 20:33 |
Though it probably does not apply to this thread, please remember that no census is complete. In my own research the fact that one section of Kensington 1841 never got microfilmed created a number of problems.
http://blog.nationalarchives.gov.uk/blog/missing-from-the-census/
|
|
Kim
|
Report
|
15 Mar 2014 22:50 |
Hello Chris, Inky1
Thank you for your additions.
Chris - I had not got either of these burials, and they do seem to be the right ones, so thank you very much for this.
Inky1 - the thought had occurred to me, before Flip kindly provided the link to the transcription. I realised I had been looking in the wrong county. In 1841 Romsley was in the Bridgnorth district and counted as part of Shropshire/Salop; from 1851 it was counted as part of the Bromsgrove district and as part of Worcestershire. Now that this is clear I shall have to re-do all my searches before concluding that the "missing" John Trow and Thomas Trow are really missing. So please hold fire on that aspect of my enquiry for a while...
Kim
|
|
ErikaH
|
Report
|
16 Mar 2014 09:04 |
Not sure which website you use for your research, but, on FMP, you can simply enter the 'place of residence'..............and click on 'search'.
Inputting 'Romsley' produces 681 records
EDIT
Re-reading your first post, I see that you use GR
|
|
ErikaH
|
Report
|
16 Mar 2014 09:24 |
What was Joseph's occupation said to be on the marriage cert?
Does it match that of the man you have found in 1841?
Born in 1822 (or thereabouts) Mary would have been quite old enough to produce a child in 1839
What age was recorded for her on her marriage cert?
|
|
ErikaH
|
Report
|
16 Mar 2014 09:26 |
FMP lists all 'known issues' with regards to censuses.......there is no mention of any for Shropshire in 1841
|
|
Kim
|
Report
|
16 Mar 2014 15:01 |
Hi Reggie
Joseph Harris occupation: simply "labourer" as posted above. So, yes, it does "match" the "agricultural labourer" of the census. However, the age on the census (60) as well as the age of "Maria Harris" in the same household (25) are both in the next category up from where I would expect, if they are in fact Mary Harris (aged 19 or 20) and her father Joseph (aged about 56/57 if his age at death of 64 in December 1848 is correct). So I am not certain this is them, although it is hard to see where the "extra" Joseph Harris might come from.
Yes, Mary would be old enough to produce a child in 1839 (17 or 18) but where is this child in 1841? He did not die until 1860. And why the long delay in her marrying the father of this child (over 4 years since the start of the relationship)?
I think I have a lot of research still to do here, and am grateful for the comments, suggestions and information provided by all. However, I think it is time to call this thread to an end, as I don't want to prolong this into an "ancestor hunt".
I think the best answer to my question was provided by Flip i.e. look for a local history society which might have transcribed the local data onto a website.
Regards
Kim
|