Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Confused
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Kay???? | Report | 12 Dec 2014 21:30 |
Marriages 1538-1973 Transcription |
|||
|
+++DetEcTive+++ | Report | 12 Dec 2014 20:03 |
Not to worry - Martha is a rather distant relative. Thank you for looking anyway :-) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Kay???? | Report | 12 Dec 2014 18:08 |
No daddy for Charles though,,,,,,,, :-( |
|||
|
+++DetEcTive+++ | Report | 12 Dec 2014 17:48 |
Thank you for the additional information - Charles Mayfield is the 'marry-in'. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Kay???? | Report | 12 Dec 2014 17:32 |
FMP, |
|||
|
+++DetEcTive+++ | Report | 9 Dec 2014 18:14 |
Until proved otherwise, I'm going to assume it was the Lincolnshire one. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Kense | Report | 8 Dec 2014 15:40 |
Perhaps this will help: |
|||
|
Kay???? | Report | 8 Dec 2014 11:04 |
Its a mystery Dec. |
|||
|
+++DetEcTive+++ | Report | 8 Dec 2014 10:08 |
It's a pity that Notts archive is closed. Wendy might have been willing to check the registers on her next visit ;-) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Kense | Report | 8 Dec 2014 09:30 |
Whoever did the PR transcription of the marriage would have got the county from the parish register, they wouldn't have had to assume a county. |
|||
|
Kay???? | Report | 7 Dec 2014 22:55 |
|
|||
|
Kense | Report | 6 Dec 2014 22:34 |
According to the GENUKI list, Caythorpe, Lincs was in the Newark district until 1934. |
|||
|
Kay???? | Report | 6 Dec 2014 21:17 |
|
|||
|
+++DetEcTive+++ | Report | 6 Dec 2014 20:56 |
:-S |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Kay???? | Report | 6 Dec 2014 18:36 |
|
|||
|
+++DetEcTive+++ | Report | 6 Dec 2014 14:23 |
I was focussed on the difference in Counties, and didn't think of doing that ;-) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Kense | Report | 6 Dec 2014 11:49 |
If you click on the place name in your freebmd search results, it will give you information about that district and subdistricts and component parishes. |
|||
|
+++DetEcTive+++ | Report | 5 Dec 2014 22:27 |
It was the Nottinghamshire v Lincolnshire aspect that was the problem. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
greyghost | Report | 5 Dec 2014 21:48 |
The Newark RD covers Caythorpe even though Newark is in Notts |
|||
|
Andysmum | Report | 5 Dec 2014 21:44 |
If you are referring to the fact that Caythorpe is in Lincolnshire and Newark is in Nottinghamshire, that is OK as the parish of Caythorpe is in Newark registration district. |