Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
1851 census - in-laws
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Pat | Report | 9 Feb 2017 23:57 |
Hi i wondered if someone could help or advice me with the 1851 census . I have found the family i am looking for but what i carnt understand is why father-in-law is stated when he is the same age as the head of houshold Joseph Jones and 9 years older than his wife Martha .Their is a son- in- law Thomas 29 and a daughter -in-law Maria age 11. I have come across this before when the children have been from previouse marriages and have been put down as in laws.This son-in-law is older than Josephs listed own children and the daughter- in- law is younger than the listed children The children are all unmarried .Where does William the father- in- law fit into this as well ? the ref no is HO107 1988/249 .thankyou for any help or advice that is given |
|||
|
safc | Report | 10 Feb 2017 00:05 |
for info |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
safc | Report | 10 Feb 2017 00:15 |
hi pat |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 10 Feb 2017 00:22 |
could this be Martin's baptism??? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
safc | Report | 10 Feb 2017 00:25 |
|
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
safc | Report | 10 Feb 2017 00:30 |
|
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 10 Feb 2017 00:50 |
?????????????? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
safc | Report | 10 Feb 2017 01:04 |
???? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 10 Feb 2017 03:30 |
Yeah .......... |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 10 Feb 2017 07:01 |
In laws in those days meant differently to todays meaning |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Pat | Report | 10 Feb 2017 09:40 |
Thankyou for your replies. I do have more info. My direct line is elizabeth Jones .The entry above Joseph and martha jones . Elizabeth was married to a John Jones ,now a widow. Joseph is Elizabeths brother-in-law . I have them on 1841 census still living next door to one another .Their is a william jones on there age 40 ,but why is he down as father-in-law on 1851. I do realize with having such a common name as jones that its going to be a challenge . |