Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Help with death cert please
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Denise | Report | 9 Mar 2017 23:05 |
Wow. Thank you all so very much. You have found so much info and have given me lots of ideas and leads. I have found searching for my G Grandfather so difficult as his name is so common. |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 9 Mar 2017 17:25 |
Wonder if it's worth tracing marriages for the elder children to see if he listed as deceased or not |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 9 Mar 2017 17:20 |
Cant identify him in the workhouse records |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 9 Mar 2017 17:03 |
Is this Elizabeth the informant could be family and will give current address |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
malyon | Report | 9 Mar 2017 16:51 |
Elizabeth Cook |
|||
|
malyon | Report | 9 Mar 2017 16:44 |
I did put a 1911 census for a George in westham |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 9 Mar 2017 16:30 |
As you say the children seem to have dispersed by 1911 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Denise | Report | 9 Mar 2017 16:27 |
Thanks for your input Margaret M. I didn't notice your name in your reply. sorry I didn't mean to appear rude.. In the 1901 census, I believe that Elizabeth told the c/reporter that George was born in Salisbury, Hants (which is incorrect) and that he was 49 in 1901(also incorrect) I have never found a census return for 1911 for George. Best regards, Denise |
|||
|
malyon | Report | 9 Mar 2017 16:25 |
found this death |
|||
|
malyon | Report | 9 Mar 2017 16:17 |
this George is not in the work house in 1911 says household |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 9 Mar 2017 16:16 |
So this is them in 1901 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
malyon | Report | 9 Mar 2017 16:13 |
Marriages Sep 1898 (>99%) |
|||
|
malyon | Report | 9 Mar 2017 15:53 |
if George died in 1915 he would be 63yrs looking at the deaths on bdm I cant see a George of that age |
|||
|
Denise | Report | 9 Mar 2017 15:52 |
No sorry, My George could not have been married for 20 years in 1911 (unless he was a bigamist !!) as he married Sarah in 1873 and they were together until she died in 1894. I think that after Sarah died, he married Elizabeth King and in 1901 they were living at 51 Albert Road, East Ham Essex, with 6 of his children and her 4 children. Thanks Denise |
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 9 Mar 2017 15:34 |
Is this him in 1911? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 9 Mar 2017 15:25 |
Have you found him on the 1911 census |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Denise | Report | 9 Mar 2017 15:25 |
Hi Shirley. It would be fantastic if you could look for me. His name is George Cook. He was born in Netherbury, Dorset in 1852. The death certificate that I have says that a George Cook died on 31 October 1915. The last positive census report I have for him is 1891 when he lived in Staveley street, N. Woolwich. I found a possible census report for him in 1901, but it has an incorrect birth place (which can happen if the informant is unsure I suppose). If this is correct, he was living with a second wife Elizabeth after being widowed. I think that it is likely to be my George as 6 of the children listed in the 1901 census report are the names of my George's children. Also, his married daughter was living next door. |
|||
|
Denise | Report | 9 Mar 2017 14:15 |
Thanks very much for your response Kath. The workhouse was actually in Leytonstone so hopefully the records will be in the same place. I shall take your advice. I appreciate your help. Denise x |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 9 Mar 2017 14:11 |
Some workhouse records are on ancestry do you want to give his name so it can be checked |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 9 Mar 2017 13:30 |
According to the workhouse website if the workhouse was the one at Woolwich then the records are kept at the London Metropolitan Archives, but Ancestry also have these records, so you could ask on the "Find Ancestors" board on here for someone with a subscription to Ancestry to do a look up for you. |