Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Who was Mary Read's Mother?
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
alviegal | Report | 27 Aug 2017 19:58 |
Here is the 1841 for Thomas with Wm and Jane Clark. |
|||
|
KeithG | Report | 28 Aug 2017 10:05 |
I'd found that possible / probable death, Chris, and it implies that Elizabeth ought to be in C1871 somewhere ... |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Mary | Report | 28 Aug 2017 10:11 |
1841 census next page to Thomas Sheals with mum Jane Clark is a John Lindsay age 30 married and a Publican. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Chris Ho :) | Report | 28 Aug 2017 10:24 |
(could be possible Mary, age below) |
|||
|
KeithG | Report | 28 Aug 2017 11:47 |
I think I must have been asleep @alviegal, you found Thomas in C1841, I skipped over that thinking it was C1851 with Thomas Ashworth and the same "parents". That looks to me fairly conclusive evidence that they are one and the same person. Thank you again! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Flip | Report | 28 Aug 2017 12:09 |
He didn't marry as Ashworth, that was his second christian name: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Chris Ho :) | Report | 28 Aug 2017 15:38 |
(need to be patient Keith, wait for Cert.!, lol) |
|||
|
Mary | Report | 28 Aug 2017 15:58 |
Mary Read 1842 is on Gro as Mary Lindsey no mums maiden name. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
KeithG | Report | 28 Aug 2017 21:22 |
Ah, thank you Mary, I should have thought of that. I was misled by her being "Mary Read" everywhere else. This is, I think, the same record as reported by both FMP and Ancestry: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Chris Ho :) | Report | 29 Aug 2017 07:25 |
(below I posted earlier for the Thomas 1855, with a couple of names) |
|||
|
greyghost | Report | 29 Aug 2017 10:43 |
Only 2 marriages showing up (Family Search) - (the Smith one not on freereg) |
|||
|
Mary | Report | 29 Aug 2017 11:04 |
1851 next door to Elizabeth Read is Charlotte Claypole 1808 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Chris Ho :) | Report | 29 Aug 2017 18:24 |
(would likely be below) |
|||
|
Mary | Report | 29 Aug 2017 19:01 |
The James reed marrying Mary Smith 20/12/1802 seems to be another family according to tree on ancestry.co.uk |
|||
Researching: |