Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
ArgyllGran
|
Report
|
6 Jul 2020 21:00 |
https://www.genesreunited.co.uk/boards/board/military_chat/thread/1385449
|
|
greyghost
|
Report
|
10 May 2019 13:43 |
https://www.genesreunited.co.uk/boards/board/military_chat/thread/1372385
|
|
Maralyn
|
Report
|
9 May 2019 19:28 |
Marriage cert: 8th June, 1874
George Chatfield - batchelor - labourer Bridget Dempsey - spinster Both full age Address: Tonbridge Father: Thomas Chatfield - labourer Father: Michael Dempsey - labourer
Not as helpful as hoped as full address not given, nor age of couple.
I'm certain that George Chatfield & George Smith are the same person.
On viewing granddad's marriage cert (1938) states: Bertie Smith (otherwise Chatfield).
|
|
Maralyn
|
Report
|
22 May 2018 13:39 |
Thanks for info on Bertie (jnr) that is certainly our man.
But info not right for Bert (snr). Bert (snr) seems to fall off the radar after the 1901 Census when he was 13 and reappears in the 1920s in Medway. Told by mother-in-law that he had been in the Army and there was mention of time in India, but maybe that was only fabrication. He would have been around 26 when WW1 started, so thought he would have been called up, unless he was in a 'reserved occupation'. Perhaps in went into the Army as a boy soldier!
|
|
+++DetEcTive+++
|
Report
|
21 May 2018 18:24 |
Around 70% of WW1 full records were destroyed during WW2 bombing. Unless you know differently, his may be among them.
This one seems to young.
Name: Bertie Smith Gender: Male Birth Place: Chatham, Kent, England Enlistment Age: 18 Regimental Number: 24356 Regiment Name: Roy Horse Arty Number of Images: 22 Form Title: Short Service Attestation Family Members: Name Relation to Soldier Bertie Smith Self (Head) John Smith Father Jane Smith Mother
Enlisted in 1902 so yob c1884. Parents lived at Speedgate, Fawkham Kent ..........
Name: Bertie Smith Gender: Male Document Year: 1915 Residence Place: 19 St Margarets Road, Elmers End Nr Beckenham Kent Regimental Number: 42318 Regiment Name: Devonshire Regiment Number of Images: 17 Form Title: Territorial Force Attestation Family Members: Name Relation to Soldier Bertie Smith Self (Head)
In 1915 he was a butchers assistant. Born 1899 ........
Ask your local library if they have the Library Edition for Ancestry and/or Findmypast. If so, you can search surviving WW1 records in person for free.
|
|
+++DetEcTive+++
|
Report
|
21 May 2018 18:12 |
Lance Corporal SMITH, BERTIE CYRIL Service Number CH/X 113349 Died 22/02/1945 Detachment 385. Royal Marines Commemorated on CHATHAM NAVAL MEMORIAL 82, 1.
Son of Gertrude Emily Smith, of Gillingham, Kent.
His records would be with the MOD. It costs £30 to order a copy.
This is the link for obtaining UK service records: http://www.veterans-uk.info/service_records/service_records.html
You might find a notice in a local paper - try Medway Archives.
|
|
Maralyn
|
Report
|
21 May 2018 16:18 |
Can I checkout newspaper reports of family without incurring a fee?
Is it possible to get Military service and records without having to pay for the service as we know Bertie Smith (1888) and his son Bertie Cyril (1924) were in the army. We believe Bertie senior was in India. We know Bertie Cyril was a war hero (Marine in Detachment 385) and died in Burma under enemy fire but when did he join the forces and where?All quite insignificant information but we would love to learn more.
|
|
greyghost
|
Report
|
20 May 2018 23:24 |
Rosina was registered as a Chatfield at birth (with mmn Dempsey).
1911 England, Wales & Scotland Census Transcription Woodside Green Lenham Near Maidstone, Lenham, Kent, England
First name(s) Last name Relationship Marital status Sex Age Birth year Birth place Occupation Walter Neaves Head Married Male 31 1880 Lenham Kent General Labourer Rosina Neaves Wife Married Female 27 1884 Lenham Kent - William Neaves Son - Male 8 1903 Lenham Kent School Auther Neaves Son - Male 5 1906 Lenham Kent - Percy Neaves Son - Male 3 1908 Lenham Kent -
Her children appear to be registered with mmn Smith not Chatfield
NEAVES, WILLIAM WALTER SMITH Order GRO Reference: 1902 D Quarter in HOLLINGBOURNE Volume 02A Page 840
NEAVES, ARTHUR JAMES SMITH Order GRO Reference: 1906 M Quarter in HOLLINGBOURNE Volume 02A Page 915 NEAVES, PERCY SMITH Order GRO Reference: 1907 D Quarter in HOLLINGBOURNE Volume 02A Page 860
|
|
greyghost
|
Report
|
20 May 2018 23:20 |
The Rosina who married Walter Neaves in 1901 is shown as Rosina Chatfield SMITH, on the transcription and original - not Rosina Chatfield-Smith
Surname First name(s) District Vol Page Marriages Dec 1901 (>99%) MERCER Hephzibah Hollingbourne 2a 1684 Neaves Walter Hollingbourn 2a 1684 SMITH Rosina Chatfield Hollingbourn 2a 1684 WHITENSTALL George A Hollingbourn 2a 1684
|
|
greyghost
|
Report
|
20 May 2018 23:00 |
2 doors away is an OLIVER family - all born Lingfield
1871 England, Wales & Scotland Census Transcription Ray Lane End, Lingfield, East Grinstead, Surrey, England
First name(s) Last name Relationship Marital status Sex Age Birth year Occupation Birth place John Oliver Head - Male 51 1820 - Surrey, England Sarah Oliver Wife - Female 45 1826 - Surrey, England John Oliver Son - Male 22 1849 - Surrey, England Frederick Oliver Son - Male 18 1853 - Surrey, England Anthony Oliver Son - Male 11 1860 - Surrey, England George Oliver Son - Male 10 1861 - Surrey, England Arthur Oliver Son - Male 7 1864 - Surrey, England Ann Oliver Daughter - Female 2 1869 - Surrey, England
|
|
greyghost
|
Report
|
20 May 2018 22:55 |
AustinQ posted this 1871 census with George and Elizabeth as lodgers -
1871 England, Wales & Scotland Census Transcription Lyne House Cottage, Lingfield, East Grinstead, Surrey, England
George Chatfield Lodger - Male 23 1848 Ag lab, Fletching Sussex, Elizabeth Chatfield Wife - Female 22 1849 Lambeth Surrey, England
The people they are lodging with are actually on the previous page of the census - and guess who? ---
1871 England, Wales & Scotland Census Transcription Lyne House Cottage, Lingfield, East Grinstead, Surrey, England
First name(s) Last name Relationship Marital status Sex Age Birth year Occupation Birth place Thomas Chatfield Head - Male 52 1819 - Sussex, England Elizabeth Chatfield Wife - Female 51 1820 - Buckinghamshire, England William Chatfield Son - Male 12 1859 - Sussex, England Rebecca Chatfield Daughter - Female 10 1861 - Sussex, England Rosina Chatfield Daughter - Female 7 1864 - Kent, England Trayton Chatfield Son - Male 6 1865 - Kent, England Name: Mother's Maiden Surname: CHATFIELD, ROSINA OLIVER Order GRO Reference: 1863 J Quarter in TONBRIDGE Volume 02A Page 466 Order
I don't see a marriage for a George Chatfield to an Elizabeth.
But daughter Mary Elizabeth mmn Dempsey was born before the 1874 marriage of George and Bridget, but birth registered as Chatfield.
|
|
Maralyn
|
Report
|
20 May 2018 20:17 |
It amazing what you have all found out for me and I thank you for all the help.
I think the article is my George, what an eye opener to our ancestors eh! It is possible to check news papers without incurring a charge?
1871 Census
George & Elizabeth Chatfield. Could this Elizabeth be our Bridget (alias Fanny/Francis) as she was born the same year 1849 and birth town is also Lambeth?
George has been known to use the surname Oliver which is his mother's maiden name and her Christian name is Elizabeth; something to consider!!
|
|
greyghost
|
Report
|
20 May 2018 14:19 |
Don't bother using GR for bmd's -
Far better to use this site for bmd's from Q3 1837 to c 1970's https://www.freebmd.org.uk
After that you will have to use a commercial site.
It won't give ages at death up to1865 but then does and it won't give mmn for births pre Q3 1911 so then use this one - you have to register but it's free to use
https://www.gro.gov.uk/gro
There, births go up to 1917 and deaths to 1957 and then you're back to freebmd/commercial sites
---------------- You say - There was another child: George Chatfield b.1877, Tunbridge Wells, according to the 1881 Census
this will be the George Chatfield born Q2 1876 that I posted already. He is listed as age 4 so the enumerator would have taken 1881 - 4 = 1877, but if he was born after April 3rd 1876 which is very likely then he would still be only 4 in 1881 at census time (taken 3rd April) . You have to remember this when looking at ages/birth years on census and also remember too that not all ages given were accurate.
|
|
AustinQ
|
Report
|
20 May 2018 13:56 |
George with his family in 1851:
1851 England, Wales & Scotland Census Transcription Merrians Cottage, Fletching, Uckfield, Sussex, England
Thomas Chatfield Head Married Male 26 1825 Agricultural Labourer Maresfield, Sussex, Elizabeth Chatfield Wife Married Female 21 1830 - Buckinghamshire, George Chatfield Son - Male 3 1848 - Fletching, Sussex, England Thomas H Chatfield Son - Male 0 1851 - Fletching, Sussex, Rebecca Oliver Servant - Female 14 1837 General Servant Heathfield, Sussex, ---------------------------------
This is Birth for George and his brother, Thomas:
CHATFIELD, GEORGE (mother's maiden name: OLIVER) GRO Reference: 1848 M Quarter in UCKFIELD Volume 07 Page 530
CHATFIELD, THOMAS HENRY (mother's maiden name: OLIVER ) GRO Reference: 1850 J Quarter in UCKFIELD Volume 07 Page 549 ------------------------------------
Parents married in 1847. George is not with his parents in 1861. ----------------------------------
Then this in the paper- which could be your George?:
Maidstone Telegraph 27 March 1869
On Wednesday before Lieut- Colonel Edward Loyd, George Oliver, alias George Chatfield, labourer of Maresfield, Sussex, was charged on suspicion of having on the night of the 10th of March, burglariously entered the dwelling house of Wm. Croucher at Frittenden. There was no evidence adduced to sustain the charge, but it transpired that the prisoner is a deserter from the 76th Regiment stationed at Shorncliffe and the magistrates ordered the man be taken to his depot and handed over to the military authorities. ----------------------------
I wondered if George had changed his name to avoid the military authorities, or if perhaps he was in trouble again after the incident in 1869?
Or perhaps he had been previously married (or living with a partner) and wanting to avoid that person?
1871 England, Wales & Scotland Census Transcription Lyne House Cottage, Lingfield, East Grinstead, Surrey, England
George Chatfield Lodger - Male 23 1848 Ag lab, Fletching Sussex, Elizabeth Chatfield Wife - Female 22 1849 Lambeth Surrey, England
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
20 May 2018 01:04 |
You don't usually see any other family members named on marriage certificates or Parish Registers for any family member other than the father and his occupation.
|
|
Maralyn
|
Report
|
20 May 2018 00:58 |
Hi
Obviously lost my last note. Never mind here goes again.
On Genes Reuniteed records there is a marriage for George Chatfield in 1874 but there is no spouse details attached. Whereas with Bridget's entry it is attached to Henry Bonwick and Ellen Woodman!
Details of Marriage certificate for:
The Parish Church in the Parish of Tonbridge
8th June 1874 George Chatfield and Bridget Dempsey Age: 'both full age' Bachelor & spinster Labourer & blank Residence: 'Tonbridge' & 'Tonbridge' Fathers' names: Thomas Chatfield & Michael Dempsey - both labourers
Witnesses:
1. George Garland 2. Elizabeth Chatfield
There was another child: George Chatfield b.1877, Tunbridge Wells, according to the 1881 Census but he died 23rd (unclear but looks like September) 1887, Lenham in the Parish of Hollingbourne, aged 11 - I have a photo of death certificate.
I have a photos of birth certificates for:
Mary Elizabeth Chatfield - 14/11/1872, Tonbridge Alfred Horice Chatfield - 02/01/1879, Sevenoaks Walter Smith - 23/08/1881, East Sutton Rosina Chatfield-Smith -01/10/1883 , Boughton Malhebe Annie Smith - 01/07/1885, Headcorn Bertie Smith - 16/03/1888, Lenham
I have a photos of marriage certificates for:
Walter CHATFIELD to a Florence Mary Ann Parker on 24/01/1920 - father's name George Chatfield. He was registered at birth as a Smith. Rosina Chatfield-Smith to a Walter ??? (name not clear) 1901 - father's name George Smith.
Annie Chatfield-Smith to a Edward John Stedman on 23/09/1904 - father's name George Smith
Photos of some certificate not very clear, but could possibly get better copies from owner.
|
|
greyghost
|
Report
|
19 May 2018 16:33 |
and the rest of the details are ............??
|
|
Maralyn
|
Report
|
19 May 2018 14:24 |
First witness on Chatfield/Dempsey is a George Garland.
Hope this helps, along with the other information sent earlier - I think. Can't find record of earlier note!!
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
19 May 2018 00:09 |
posted earlier by greyghost ........
I just wonder if George Chatfield and George Smith are one and the same person?
Surname First name(s) District Vol Page Births Mar 1848 (>99%) CHATFIELD George Uckfield 7 530
Uckfield RD covers Maresfield where George Smith says he was born.
however there are numerous George Smith's born Uckfield RD
----------------
I wondered if mmn might have been Smith ........
Birth registration from GRO Index for the George Chatfield born in 1848, with mmn (mother's maiden name)
CHATFIELD, GEORGE mmn OLIVER GRO Reference: 1848 M Quarter in UCKFIELD Volume 07 Page 530
Only 2 George Smith's born 1846-1850 and registered in Uckfield ......
SMITH, GEORGE mmn DRAWBRIDGE GRO Reference: 1846 J Quarter in UCKFIELD Volume 07 Page 528
SMITH, GEORGE mmn REED GRO Reference: 1848 D Quarter in UCKFIELD Volume 07 Page 515
|
|
greyghost
|
Report
|
18 May 2018 23:21 |
I don't understand when you say Bridget married George in 1874 but records don't show who George married.
Here is the transcription taken from the GRO index showing the marriage - (an Ellen and Henry Bonwick can be found on the 1881 census in Tunbridge).
Whichever name you put in initially the other comes up
Surname First name(s) District Vol Page Marriages Jun 1874 (>99%) BONWICK Henry Tunbridge 2a 868 Chatfield George Tunbridge 2a 868 <<<<<<<< DEMPSEY Bridget Tunbridge 2a 868 <<<<<<<< Woodman Ellen Tunbridge 2a 868
If you actually have the marriage certificate can you post all the information it contains please - where the marriage took place, names, ages, abode and occupations of bride and groom, name and occupation of Fathers and if deceased. Names of witnesses.
I have posted the pre and post 1883 births with both Chatfield and Smith registrations (spelling of mmn suspect on a couple but think they are possibly correct. Just missing 1 if Bridget had 11 as she says in 1911.
Mary Elizabeth 1872 so pre marriage, Alice 1874, George 1876, Alfred Horace are registered as Chatfield then comes Walter in 1881 as Smith before back to Chatfield for Rosina 1883 and then back to Smith for Annie 1885, Bertie 1888, Emily Dora 1891 and ?George Frank 1893
So I'm wondering if Bridget married George Chatfield and for some reason THEY changed their name to SMITH and she to Frances as it wasn't so stand out as Bridget.
|